Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-30T07:59:35Z

1 revision

at 07:59, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T07:59:35Z

Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-30T07:39:56Z

1 revision

at 07:39, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T07:39:56Z

Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-30T07:30:14Z

1 revision

at 07:30, 30 May 2014

2014-05-30T07:30:13Z

Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-29T14:28:10Z

1 revision

at 14:28, 29 May 2014

2014-05-29T14:28:10Z

Paul: 1 revision

2014-05-29T13:32:41Z

1 revision

at 13:32, 29 May 2014

2014-05-29T13:32:41Z

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ==References==
 <references></references>
-  [[Category:Umasking Evolution]]
+  [[Category:Unmasking Evolution]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==The Facts Are ..... ==
-(1) The problem for evolution is that if short period comets only last about 10,000 years, and the solar system is 5 billion years old, then there should not be any of these comets left in existence. As short-period comets have been visible this century (eg Halley's comet), the solar system must be considerably younger than the date assigned to it by evolutionary theory. [based on logic]
+{{Fact|1}} The problem for evolution is that if short period comets only last about 10,000 years, and the solar system is 5 billion years old, then there should not be any of these comets left in existence. As short-period comets have been visible this century (eg Halley's comet), the solar system must be considerably younger than the date assigned to it by evolutionary theory. [based on logic]
-(2) The belief in a 5 billion year old solar system has led to a hypothesis that these comets must be resupplied from outside the solar system - an example of a preconceived idea determining scientific belief. A vast shell of 100 billion comets, called the 'Oort Cloud' is theorized to exist at the outer edge of the solar system. Passing stars are supposed to disturb the cloud enough to knock a comet into an inner orbit. This is a theory that is not based on any observed facts.<ref> Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 31, 1974</ref>
+{{Fact|2}} The belief in a 5 billion year old solar system has led to a hypothesis that these comets must be resupplied from outside the solar system - an example of a preconceived idea determining scientific belief. A vast shell of 100 billion comets, called the 'Oort Cloud' is theorized to exist at the outer edge of the solar system. Passing stars are supposed to disturb the cloud enough to knock a comet into an inner orbit. This is a theory that is not based on any observed facts.<ref> Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 31, 1974</ref>
 p:385-401
-(3) The facts about the Oort cloud are:- (1) It has never been observed, and should be regarded as an evolutionary prediction; (2) The calculated motions of comets do not match well with any predictions based on the Oort Cloud; and (3) Cometary evidence does not support the existence of an Oort cloud.
+{{Fact|3}} The facts about the Oort cloud are:- (1) It has never been observed, and should be regarded as an evolutionary prediction; (2) The calculated motions of comets do not match well with any predictions based on the Oort Cloud; and (3) Cometary evidence does not support the existence of an Oort cloud.
   <ref>Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 31, 1974 p:385-401</ref>
-(4) Some researchers believe that if the Oort theory is true, then some comets from our solar system should have escaped. Likewise, we should have seen about six comets over the past 150 years from other star systems. <ref>Science Frontiers, May-June, 1990 p:1; Sky & Telescope, Vol. 79, 1990 p:254</ref>
+{{Fact|4}} Some researchers believe that if the Oort theory is true, then some comets from our solar system should have escaped. Likewise, we should have seen about six comets over the past 150 years from other star systems. <ref>Science Frontiers, May-June, 1990 p:1; Sky & Telescope, Vol. 79, 1990 p:254</ref>
-(5) As the Oort Cloud has not been discovered yet, new theories are rising to explain the existence of short-life comets. The latest theory is that "Halley's comet comes from a second much closer belt of millions of comets just outside the solar system left over as debris and junk when the outer planets formed 5 billion years ago". This theory is spoken of in a factual manner, yet is not based on fact. <ref>The Advertiser (Adelaide), May 14, 1988 p:20</ref>
+{{Fact|5}} As the Oort Cloud has not been discovered yet, new theories are rising to explain the existence of short-life comets. The latest theory is that "Halley's comet comes from a second much closer belt of millions of comets just outside the solar system left over as debris and junk when the outer planets formed 5 billion years ago". This theory is spoken of in a factual manner, yet is not based on fact. <ref>The Advertiser (Adelaide), May 14, 1988 p:20</ref>
-(6) A theory put forward for the origins of short-period comets states that they are belched out of volcanoes, most probably on Jupiter. But, (1) the theory is not supported by observation; (2) there is no planetary mechanism that would impart the force needed to expel the comets; (3) the physical makeup of comets does not match this origin; and (4) the comet would need to be travelling at over 700 Km/sec to escape a large planet, a speed which would cause it to vaporize in the process. Harold S.
+{{Fact|6}} A theory put forward for the origins of short-period comets states that they are belched out of volcanoes, most probably on Jupiter. But, (1) the theory is not supported by observation; (2) there is no planetary mechanism that would impart the force needed to expel the comets; (3) the physical makeup of comets does not match this origin; and (4) the comet would need to be travelling at over 700 Km/sec to escape a large planet, a speed which would cause it to vaporize in the process. Harold S.
 Slusher, "Age of the Cosmos: ICR technical Monograph #9", <ref>Institute for Creation Research: San Diego, 1980 p:49</ref>
-(7) The evidence of life on comets is based on infra-red analysis of Haley's Comet which indicated that organic matter was pouring out of its head and tail. A study of the data, however, suggests that these organic molecules are not the kind associated with living organisms. <ref>The Sydney Morning Herald, April 3, 1986 p:2</ref>
+{{Fact|7}} The evidence of life on comets is based on infra-red analysis of Haley's Comet which indicated that organic matter was pouring out of its head and tail. A study of the data, however, suggests that these organic molecules are not the kind associated with living organisms. <ref>The Sydney Morning Herald, April 3, 1986 p:2</ref>
 ==References==
 <references></references>
   [[Category:Umasking Evolution]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:59, 30 May 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:39, 30 May 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:30, 30 May 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:28, 29 May 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:32, 29 May 2014
(No difference)

Comets - Revision history

Paul: 1 revision

at 07:59, 30 May 2014

Paul: 1 revision

at 07:39, 30 May 2014

Paul: 1 revision

at 07:30, 30 May 2014

Paul: 1 revision

at 14:28, 29 May 2014

Paul: 1 revision

at 13:32, 29 May 2014